Ex Parte Menz et al - Page 6


              Appeal No. 2006-3179                                                               Page 6                
              Application No. 10/477,069                                                                               

              problem to be solved as a whole would have suggested to those of ordinary skill in the                   
              art.”  In re Kahn, 441 F.3d 977, 987-988, 78 USPQ2d 1329, 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2006).                         
                     We begin our analysis with the observation that the nature of the problem                         
              addressed by Gupta, Ogawa, and the claimed subject matter are the same.  Gupta                           
              describes his “invention” as the modification of a lens body surface “to possess a                       
              desired characteristic.”  Gupta, page 3, lines 30-33.  Similarly, Ogawa’s patent is                      
              directed to processes for modifying substrate surfaces with active agents that confer                    
              desirable surface properties.  Ogawa, column 5, lines 46-52; column 6, lines 57-60.                      
              Claim 1 is also a method of modifying surfaces, particularly by inactivating Bronstėd                    
              bases on the surface of an intraocular lens body.                                                        
                     In addition to addressing the same general problem, both Gupta and Ogawa are                      
              also engaging the same basic technology to solve it, i.e., the application of bifunctional               
              silane/perfluoroalkyl reagents to the substrate surface.  The Gupta patent identifies two                
              chemical functionalities present in its surface modifying reagent which are used to                      
              achieve the surface properties desired for an artificial optical lens: a reactive silane                 
              group and a second functional group that acts to modify the lens’s surface properties.                   
              Gupta, page 5.  This structure is generically described in Gupta by the formula “R1-X-                   
              R2,” where R1 is the silane group, R2 is the second functional group, and X is the joining               
              group.  Id., page 5, lines 31-37.  In particular, Gupta teaches that the combination of a                
              trialkyamino silane (R1) and perfluoroalkyl (R2) confer biological inertness and low glare               
              to the lens body, depending on the surface thickness.  Id., page 6, Table 1.  The                        
              perfluoroalkyl group derivative is covalently joined to a silane group.   The silane group               
              is used to attach the perfluoroalkyl to the lens surface because it is a “versatile” reagent             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007