The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JACK E. CAVENEY and VICTOR D. POTTER ____________ Appeal 2006-3240 Application 10/316,436 Technology Center 3600 ____________ Decided: December 21, 2006 Heard: December 12, 2006 ____________ Before JENNIFER D. BAHR, ROBERT E. NAPPI and LINDA E. HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges. HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 USC § 134(a) from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-12, 14-37, 39-42, 46, and 47, all of the claims pending in the application. Claims 13, 38, and 43-45 have been canceled. We REVERSE.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007