Ex Parte Caveney et al - Page 2



              Appeal 2006-3240                                                                                            
              Application 10/316,436                                                                                      
                                                   BACKGROUND                                                             
                     The appellants’ invention relates to a cable support system.  Claim 18,                              
              reproduced below, is representative of the subject matter on appeal.  A copy of all                         
              of the claims can be found in the appendix to the appellants’ brief.                                        

                     18. A cable support system comprising:                                                               
                            a hanger plate securable to a structure;                                                      
                            a first cable support member directly attachable to the hanger plate;                         
                     and                                                                                                  
                            a chaining plate attachable to the hanger plate without removing the                          
                     first cable support member from the hanger plate, the chaining plate                                 
                     accommodating a plurality of cable support members.                                                  

                     The examiner relies upon the following as evidence of unpatentability:                               
                      Russell                                 806,192           Dec. 05, 1905                             
                      Rinderer                                5,961,081         Oct. 05, 1999                             
                      Meyer                                   6,565,048         May 20, 2003                              
                     The following rejections are before us for review.                                                   
                 1. Claims 1-5, 7-9, 11, 12, 14-26, 28, 30-32, 34-37, 39-42, 46, and 47 stand                             
                     rejected under 35 USC § 103(a) as unpatentable over Meyer in view of                                 
                     Russell.                                                                                             
                 2. Claims 6, 10, 27, 29, and 33 stand rejected under 35 USC § 103(a) as                                  
                     unpatentable over Meyer in view of Russell and further in view of Rinderer.                          


                                                            2                                                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007