Ex Parte Paquet et al - Page 1




                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                    
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                      __________                                                          
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                      __________                                                          
                      Ex parte DONALD ALBERT PAQUET JR., ROBERT JOHN BARSOTTI,                                            
                 LAURA ANN LEWIN, CARL BRENT DOUGLAS and MICHEAL CHARLES GRADY                                            
                                                      __________                                                          
                                                 Appeal No. 2006-3248                                                     
                                              Application No. 10/617,585                                                  
                                                      __________                                                          
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                      __________                                                          
              Before LEBOVITZ, ADAMS, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
              LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      

                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     This appeal involves claims to curable coating compositions.  The Examiner has                       
              rejected the claims as indefinite and anticipated.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                    
              § 134.  We reverse both rejections.                                                                         
                                                      Background                                                          
                     Curable coating compositions are “used in automobile refinish and Original                           
              Equipment Manufacturing (OEM) applications” to coat substrate surfaces.                                     
              Specification, page 1, lines 9-10.  The compositions typically contain a polymer                            
              component and a crosslinking component which, when mixed together and allowed to                            
              cure, form a durable and resistant finish.  Id., page 2, lines 5-6.  After a surface has                    






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007