Appeal No. 2006-3253 Page 16
Application No. 10/276,547
Summary
The specification does not disclose a substantial, credible utility for the
compounds identified in the claimed method, and Appellant cannot rely on post-filing
evidence to bolster the specification’s disclosure. The rejections under 35 U.S.C.
§§ 101 and 112, first paragraph are affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
Toni R. Scheiner )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Eric Grimes )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
Nancy J. Linck )
Administrative Patent Judge )
EG/jlb
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007