Ex Parte Verbil et al - Page 3



         Appeal No. 2006-3280                                                       
         Application No. 09/874,152                                                 
              if the subscriber line is busy, forwarding the call to an             
         intelligent peripheral within an Advanced Intelligent Network              
         (AIN) telecommunications system;                                           
              queuing the call to the subscriber in the intelligent                 
         peripheral;                                                                
              determining that the subscriber line is not busy by dialing           
         the subscriber line from the intelligent peripheral; and                   
              if a call is queued in the intelligent peripheral and the             
         subscriber line is determined to be not busy, connecting the call          
         to the subscriber with the subscriber line.                                
                                     References                                     
         The Examiner relies on the following references:                           
         Andrews et al. (Andrews)   5,271,058   Dec. 14, 1993                       
         Weisser, Jr. et al. (Weisser)      5,600,710       Feb. 4, 1997            
         Watts                              5,668,861   Sep. 16, 1997               
                                            (filed Dec. 23, 1993)                   
         Marks et al. (Marks)               5,844,896       Dec. 1, 1998            
                                                    (filed Feb. 26, 1997)           
         Knoerle et al. (Knoerle)           6,597,780       Jul. 22, 2003           
                                                     (filed Dec. 16, 1999)          
                                  Rejections at Issue                               
         A.  Claims 1, 4 through 10, 21 through 28 stand rejected under             
         35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the combination of              
         Weisser, Knoerle and Watts.                                                

         B.  Claims 11 through 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as           
         being unpatentable over the combination of Weisser and Knoerle.            
                                         3                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007