The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DANIEL P. IVKOVICH, JR.,
ANDREW J. SKOOG,JANE A. MURPHY, THOMAS W. RENTZ,
WILLAIM R. STOWELL and BRYAN T. BOJANOWSKI
____________
Appeal 2006-3437
Application 10/702,801
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: November 16, 2006
____________
Before KIMLIN, WALTZ, and GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-20. Claim 1 is
illustrative:
1. A method for applying an optical coating to an article surface of a
metallic article, comprising the steps of:
furnishing the metallic article having the article surface;
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007