Ex Parte Hossel et al - Page 7


             Appeal No. 2007-0080                                                               Page 7                
             Application No. 09/771,595                                                                               

                    George describes several considerations that would be taken into account by the                   
             skilled worker in determining the choice of a sunscreen agent for the skin.                              
                    The protective strength of a particular sunscreen agent on the skin                               
                    depends on a variety of factors … [which include] … distribution (or                              
                    deployment) of the sunscreen molecules on the skin, the spectral UV                               
                    properties of the sunscreen, the photostability of the sunscreen, the                             
                    chemical structure, the concentration of the sunscreen, the penetration of                        
                    the sunscreens into the stratum corneum, and the spreading properties of                          
                    the vehicle and the subsequent adherence to skin.                                                 
             George, column 1, lines 47-54.                                                                           
                    This disclosure indicates that, as Appellants urge, the skilled artisan would not                 
             have “considered all sun screen agents as equivalent independent of the nature of the                    
             product.”  Brief, page 5.  To the contrary, the skilled worker would have known that the                 
             chemical structure of the sunscreen in the context of the substrate (i.e., skin or hair) to              
             which it is applied would influence its efficacy in protecting the substrate from sun.                   
             George provides pertinent considerations for sunscreens which are to be used on the                      
             skin.  However, there is no evidence in the record of whether these same                                 
             considerations would be applicable to the hair or what other factors would have been                     
             deemed relevant.  Consequently, we have insufficient evidence to conclude that the                       
             skilled worker would have recognized that zinc oxide could be utilized in Dieing’s                       
             haircare product.                                                                                        
                    In addition to this, Tanner also weakens the Examiner’s case.  According to                       
             Tanner,                                                                                                  
                    inorganic compounds such as zinc oxide … are not easily formulated into                           
                    stable products. For example these materials tend to agglomerate in the                           
                    finished formulations, thus losing their effectiveness and resulting in                           
                    unacceptable aesthetic properties such as whitening and viscosity                                 
                    changes. Furthermore, materials such as zinc oxide are reactive materials                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007