CHANG V. LUCIW et al. - Page 2




                               FURTHER ORDERED that junior party Paul A. Luciw and Dino Dina is                        
                 not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-45 of its patent 6,531,276, which claims                 
                 correspond to Count 1, the sole count of the interference.  (Paper 1 at 5);                           
                               FURTHER ORDERED that, if there is a settlement agreement the parties                    
                 are directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd.R. 205; and                                                 
                               FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment and the Decision on                        
                 priority (Paper 143) shall be entered into the administrative records of Luciw’s 6,531,276            
                 patent and Chang's 06/693,866 application.                                                            




                                                                                                                      


                                                    /Sally Gardner Lane/   )                                           
                                                    Administrative Patent Judge )                                      
                                                                                )   BOARD OF                           
                                           )      PATENT                                                               
                                                    /Michael P. Tierney/  )   APPEALS AND                              
                                                    Administrative Patent Judge )  INTERFERENCES                       
                                                                                )                                      
                                                                                )                                      
                                                    /James T. Moore/  )                                                
                                                    Administrative Patent Judge )                                      












                                                          2                                                            


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013