1 For the reasons given in the Memorandum Opinion and Order (Paper 2 111) and the MEMORANDUM OPINION (Paper 114), it is 3 ORDERED that a final judgment is entered. 4 FURTHER ORDERED that Rossin claims 1-3, 6-9, and 16-26 5 are unpatentable over the prior art. 35 U.S.C. §§ 102/103. 6 FURTHER ORDERED that Rossin claims 10-15 are 7 unpatentable for failure to comply with the fourth paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 8 § 112. 9 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this FINAL 10 JUDGMENT shall be placed in the files of (1) Kanno application 11 10/676,013 and (2) Rossin U.S. Patent 6,673,326 B1. 12 FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement, attention is 13 directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c). 14 15 16 /ss/ Fred E. McKelvey ) 17 FRED E. McKELVEY ) 18 Senior Administrative Patent Judge ) 19 ) BOARD OF 20 /ss/ Richard E. Schafer ) PATENT 20 RICHARD E. SCHAFER ) APPEALS 21 22 Administrative Patent Judge ) AND 23 ) INTERFERENCES 24 /ss/ Adriene Lepiane Hanlon ) 25 ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON ) 26 Administrative Patent Judge ) 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013