Interference No. 105,422
Bass v. Goldberg
1 Judgment - Merits -- Bd. R. 127
2
3 In a decision on motions dated April 16, 2007, the Board has
4 determined that all of party Goldberg’s claims corresponding to the count,
5 i.e., application claims 50-80, are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first
6 paragraph, for lack of written description. Consequently, Goldberg is
7 without standing to proceed further in this interference. It is now time
8 appropriate to enter judgment against party Goldberg. It is
9 ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of the count is
10 herein entered against the senior party MARTIN GOLDBERG, MARTIN
11 DIGGELMAN, EARL HUBBELL, GLENN McGALL, NAM QUOC NGO,
12 MACDONALD MORRIS, MEL YAMAMOTO, JENNIFER TAN and
13 RICHARD P. RAVA;
14 FURTHER ORDERED that senior party MARTIN GOLDBERG,
15 MARTIN DIGGELMAN, EARL HUBBELL, GLENN McGALL, NAM QUOC
16 NGO, MACDONALD MORRIS, MEL YAMAMOTO, JENNIFER TAN and
17 RICHARD P. RAVA is not entitled to a patent containing its application
18 claims 50-80;
19
−2−
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013