1 Count 2 has been substituted for Count 1. (Decision, Paper 36 and
2 Redeclaration, Paper 37). Sedrani requests adverse judgment as to Count
3 2. (See Paper 23).
4 Upon consideration of the record of the interference and for reasons
5 given, it is
6 ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 2, the sole
7 count of the interference, is entered against senior party RICHARD
8 SEDRANI and VALERIE QUESNIAUX;
9 FURTHER ORDERED that senior party RICHARD SEDRANI
10 and VALERIE QUESNIAUX is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-4
11 of patent 6,635,745, which claims correspond to Count 2;
12 FURTHER ORDERED that, if there is a settlement agreement,
13 the parties are directed to 35 USC §135(c) and Bd. R. 205; and
14 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment, the
15 Redeclaration (Bd. R. 203(c)) (Paper 37), and the Decision (Bd. R. 125(a))
16 (Paper 36) shall be entered into the administrative records of the Molnar-
17 Kimber application 09/576,951 and Sedrani patent 6,635,745.
18
19
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013