1 FURTHER ORDERED that POLYFLOR LIMITED is not entitled
2 to a patent containing claims 26-34 and 51-66 (corresponding to Counts 1
3 and 2) of Application 09/807,167;
4 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be made of
5 record in the file of Patent 6,579,610, and Application 09/807,167; and
6 FURTHER ORDERED that if there is any settlement agreement
7 which has not been filed, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and
8 37 CFR § 41.205.
/Richard E. Schafer/_____________ )
RICHARD E. SCHAFER )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
/Michael P. Tierney/ ____________ ) BOARD OF PATENT
MICHAEL P. T IERNEY ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
/James T. Moore/_______________ )
JAMES T. MOORE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
- 2 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013