Interference No. 105,529
McMahon v. Strand
Before LEE, LANE and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
Judgment -- Order to Show Cause -- Bd. R. 202(d)
1 On August 31, 2007, junior party McMahon was ordered to show cause why
2 judgment should not be entered against it for a lack of showing that it is entitled to
3 priority. On September 11, 2007, junior party McMahon filed a communication
4 stating that it “abandons the above-captioned interference and will not oppose or
5 otherwise respond to the Order to Show Cause of August 31, 2007.” Because
6 junior party McMahon has failed to show good cause why judgment should not be
7 entered against party McMahon, it is now time appropriate to enter judgment.
8 It is
9 ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count 1 is
10 herein entered against junior party MICHAEL J. McMAHON, ART MALIN,
11 STEVE AUSNIT, DONALD L. CREVIER, JOEL JOHNSON and DAVID J.
12 MATTHEWS;
13 FURTHER ORDERED that junior party MICHAEL J. McMAHON, ART
14 MALIN, STEVE AUSNIT, DONALD L. CREVIER, JOEL JOHNSON and
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013