1 Accordingly, it is
2 ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Paper 1 at 4) in the
3 interference is awarded against senior party RUDOLPH FUCHS.
4 FURTHER ORDERED that senior party RUDOLPH FUCHS is not
5 entitled to a patent containing claims 1-19 (corresponding to Count 1) of U.S.
6 Patent 6,293,039.
7 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in
8 the files of application 09/270,461 and U.S. Patent 6,293,039.
9 FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, attention is
10 directed to 35 U.S.C. ' 135(c) and Bd.R. 205.
/Richard E. Schafer/ )
RICHARD E. SCHAFER )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
/Sally G. Lane/ )BOARD OF PATENT
SALLY G. LANE ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
/Sally C. Medley/ )
SALLY C. MEDLEY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
−2−
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013