Interference No. 105,554
Nakamura v. Ito
1 Junior party Nakamura has requested entry of adverse judgment (Paper 15). The request
2 is granted. Accordingly, it is
3 ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count 1 is herein
4 entered against junior party KAZUSHIGE NAKAMURA, AKIO MARUYAMA, NORIYUKI
5 TAKAGI, and MICHIYO SEKIYA;
6 FURTHER ORDERED that junior party KAZUSHIGE NAKAMURA, AKIO
7 MARUYAMA, NORIYUKI TAKAGI, and MICHIO SEKIYA is not entitled to claims 1-12 of
8 its involved Patent No. 5,693,443, which correspond to Count 1;
9 FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note
10 the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd. Rule 205; and
11 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be placed in the respective
12 involved application or patent of the parties.
/ss/ Jameson Lee )
JAMESON LEE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
/ss/ Sally Gardner Lane ) BOARD OF PATENT
SALLY GARDNER LANE ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
/ss/ James T. Moore )
JAMES T. MOORE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013