Appeal 2006-0009
Reexamination Control 90/005,589
Patent 5,940,464
1 Conclusion
2 The Appellant’s request for rehearing has been granted to the extent
3 that the “DECISION ON APPEAL” dated May 12, 2006, has been
4 reconsidered in light of the Appellant’s arguments. However, the request is
5 denied because we decline to modify the decision in any respect.
6 No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
7 this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a) (2006).
8 REHEARING DENIED
cc: via U.S. MAIL
Thomas M. Coester
BLAKELY, SOKOLOF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN, LLP
12400 Wilshire Boulevard
Seventh Floor
Los Angeles, California 90025
js
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4
Last modified: September 9, 2013