Appeal No. 2006-0355 Application No. 09/905,574 to satisfy the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 162 and 37 CFR § 1.163(a), and therefore insufficient to satisfy the requirements of the first and second paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. § 112. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. According to Appellants, ‘GL4/66’ “originated from an open pollinated population of seedlings derived from the variety ‘Yumyeong’ planted in 1990 at the HortResearch experimental orchard in Havelock North, New Zealand” (Specification 1: 6-8), and “one seedling representing the present variety was selected and asexually propagated for further evaluation . . . The selection was further propagated by asexual reproduction for the first time in 1995” (id. at 1: 9-12). 2. According to Appellants, the single photograph filed with the application “shows typical specimens of the foliage and the fruit of the new variety [‘GL4/66’] [ ] depicted in colours as nearly true as is reasonably possible . . . The upper and lower surfaces of the leaves, and [ ] exterior view[s] of the fruit, are shown. The photograph was taken after two weeks air storage of fruit harvested at eating maturity” (id. at 2: 5-9). 3. According to Appellants, ‘GL4/66’ produces “medium to large white flesh, clingstone fruit with a sweet sub-acid taste and very firm crisp flesh with good fruit aroma . . . The firm flesh exhibits good storage and the skin has an attractive pink colour over a cream background. The fruit ripens mid season approximately two weeks before the ‘Yumyeong’ parent variety.” Id. at 1: 21 to 2: 2. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013