The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PIETER MARTIN LUGT, EUSTHATIOS IOANNIDES,
INGRID VICTORIA WIKSTROM, JOHN HOWARD TRIPP,
MARIE-LAURE DUMONT, ANTONIO GABELLI and
BENOIT CLEMENT JACOD
____________
Appeal No. 2006-0833
Application No. 10/297,832
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CRAWFORD, BAHR and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 and 3
to 10. Claim 2 has been cancelled and claim 11 is objected to.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013