Ex Parte Schutz - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                        for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ___________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ___________                                                   
                                      Ex parte  DOMINIK SCHUTZ                                               
                                               ___________                                                   
                                           Appeal No. 2006-0921                                              
                                        Application No. 10/083,079                                           
                                          Technology Center 3682                                             
                                               ___________                                                   
                                                ON BRIEF                                                     
                                               ___________                                                   

            Before CRAWFORD, NAPPI and FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.                                
            CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           



                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134 from the examiner's final                  
            rejection of claims 1 to 11 and 13.  Claims 12 and 14 have been found to be                      
            allowable by the examiner.                                                                       
                The appellant's invention relates to a vehicle steering wheel with a gas bag                 
            module mounted displaceably for actuating a horn (specification page 1).  An                     




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013