Appeal 2006-0990 Application 10/209,369 claim 1 encompasses any mole percent ratio between the diacid residues and the glycol residues based on the total mole percent of all residues in the polymer as a whole, wherein the total mole percent of all the diacid and all the glycol residues in the polymer as a whole ranges from 99 to 99.9 mole percent and the remaining 0.1 to 1.0 mole percent is the specified mole percent of the sulfonate component residue. Indeed, there is no basis in the claim language or the disclosure in the Specification on which to read into claim 1 the limitation that the mole percent of the sulfonate residue is based on the total moles of diacid residues when it is a diacid comonomer, or on the total moles of glycol residues when it is a glycol comonomer (Specification 10:18-22). In clear contrast, the aliphatic-aromatic copolyetherester polymers of the Warzelhan references are described as the polymerization products of at least two mixtures of reactants stated to comprise at least the specified mole percent ranges of aliphatic and aromatic dicarboxylic acid reactants in the diacid first mixture, and, of dihydroxy reactants, among others, C2-6 alkanediols and certain poly(alkylene ether)glycols, in the dihydroxy, that is, glycol, second mixture. The optional sulfonated reactant when present is included in the total mole percent of the diacid reactant mixture. See Warzelhan ‘045, e.g., col. 1, ll. 6-44, col. 3, l. 8, to col. 4, l. 13, and col. 6, ll. 17-582; Warzelhan ‘248, e.g., col. 1, ll. 8-55, col. 3, l. 30, to col. 4, l. 34, col. 9, ll. 4-60, and Warzelhan ‘248 Example 2.3 2 The polymer of Warzelhan ‘045 Example 1 is not prepared with a sulfonated compound. 3 In Warzelhan ‘248 Example 2, the sodium sulfophthalate compound is an aromatic dicarboxylic acid monomer. The polymer of Warzelhan ‘248 Example 1 is not prepared with a sulfonated compound. 13Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013