The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte THIERRY VANDENDRIESSCHE, MARINEE CHUAH, STEFAN KOCHANEK, and GUDRUN SCHIEDNER __________ Appeal 2006-1036 Application 10/191,760 Technology Center 1600 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before ADAMS, GREEN, and LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges. GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 6, 12, 13, and 17.1 Claims 6 and 13 are representative of the claims on appeal, and read as follows: 1 Claim 1 is indicated as being allowable, and claims 2-5, 7-11, 14-16, 18, and 19 have been cancelled (Answer 2).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013