Appeal No. 2006-1084
Reexamination Control No. 90/006,334
1 of access based on matching access rules to information determined from the
2 assembled multi-packet communication (claim 15), much less the non-
3 intrusive manner of assembling a multi-packet communication and
4 subsequent non-intrusive applying of rules to the assembled multi-packet
5 communication as are recited in claims 1 and 15.
6 For a number of claim features including the assembling of multi-
7 packet communication, the Examiner collectively cites to the following
8 portions of Abraham: Figs. 2, 3A, 9A-9D, col. 5, lines 25-30, col. 6, lines
9 47-54, et seq., and col. 7, lines 15-25, et seq., and col. 11, lines 13, et seq.
10 For the feature of applying access rules of claim 1, the Examiner cites to
11 these portions of Abraham: Abstract, Figs. 2, 3A [elements 50, 62, 72, 76,
12 78], 4 [element 50], 5, 7A-7C, 8E, 9A-12, 15A-118, col. 2, lines 13-35, et
13 seq., col. 5, lines 54-59, et seq., col. 6, lines 25-36, et seq., col. 7, lines 38-
14 65, et seq., col. 8, lines 13-25, et seq., col. 9, lines 55, et seq., and col. 11,
15 line 1, et seq. For the feature of applying access rules of claim 11 and
16 controlling access based on matching rules of claim 15, the Examiner cites
17 to these portions of Abraham: Figs. 14-15B, 16, 21, 24, 25A-B, col. 6, lines
18 25-35, et seq. and lines 63-67, et seq., col. 7-8, col. 9, lines 43-67, et seq.,
19 col. 10, lines 13-25, and col. 11-12. We have reviewed all of the cited
20 portions referenced by the Examiner. However, not in any instance do we
21 find disclosure of the assembling of received or intercepted data packets into
22 a multi-packet communication for purposes of application of any access rule
23 or the application of access rule to an assembled multi-packet
24 communication (claim 1) or information content acquired from the
15
Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013