The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte
GARY ROBERT KELM, JEFFREY WARREN CLYMER,
SATINDER SINGH BHARAJ, MARY ANN STARCHER,
and CYNTHIA ELODI FRANCIS
__________
Appeal 2006-1223
Application 10/214,009
Technology Center 1600
__________
DECIDED: May 23, 2007
__________
Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DONALD E. ADAMS, and LORA M. GREEN,
Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 1, 2, and 4-17. Claims 18-37 are also pending, but have been
withdrawn from consideration. The Examiner has rejected the claims as
unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). We have jurisdiction under 35
U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013