The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte DIETER JUNGE and ARMIN SEGELER
___________
Appeal No. 2006-1289
Application No. 10/473,320
Technology Center 3600
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Decided: February 27, 2007
___________
Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, JENNIFER D. BAHR, ROBERT E. NAPPI,
Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134 from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 4 to 7, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
Claims 1 to 3 and 8 have been cancelled.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013