The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ASSAF GOVARI ____________ Appeal 2006-1324 Application 09/882,127 Technology Center 3700 ____________ Decided: March 14, 2007 ____________ Before WILLIAM F. PATE III, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and ROBERT E. NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges. WILLIAM F. PATE III, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 6-23, 25 and 27-43. These are the only claims in the application. The claimed invention is directed to a medical device which has a body and a position sensor placed on the body. The position sensor is made of Wiegand effect material. Such a material produces a magnetic field thatPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013