The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RICHARD E. GADY and STEPHEN A. FEDERIGHE ____________ Appeal 2006-1399 Application 10/666,712 Technology Center 3600 ____________ Decided: March 21, 2007 ____________ Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and ROBERT E. NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges. CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE This appeal involves claims 15 to 35, the only claims pending in this application. Claims 1 to 14 have been canceled. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013