Ex Parte Rolph - Page 1



           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent       
                                            of the Board.                                            

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                      
                                            ___________                                              
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                        
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                              
                                            ___________                                              
                                       Ex parte JOHN ROLPH                                           
                                            ___________                                              
                                       Appeal No. 2006-1400                                          
                                     Application No. 10/649,128                                      
                                      Technology Center 3700                                         
                                            ___________                                              
                                       Decided: July 30, 2007                                        
                                            ___________                                              
           Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, TERRY J. OWENS and JENNIFER D. BAHR,                         
           Administrative Patent Judges.                                                             
           PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        


                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                             
                                    STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                            
                 This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-13.  These are the only      
           claims remaining in the application.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                
           §§ 134 and 6.                                                                             






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013