The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte DAVE B. LUNDAHL
________________
Appeal 2006-1417
Application 09/326,405
Technology Center 3600
________________
Decided: September 21, 2007
________________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and
CHARLES F. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Appellant requests rehearing of our Decision of October 27, 2006,
wherein we sustained the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 11-13 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a).
We have thoroughly reviewed Appellant’s Request but we do not
subscribe to Appellant’s position that we misapprehended or overlooked the
points made in the Request. In our view, the arguments made by Appellant
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013