1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
6 ____________
7
8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
9 AND INTERFERENCES
10 ____________
11
12 Ex parte RONALD L. EDENS, JAMES J. HLABAN, LAURA J. KEELY,
13 THOMAS P. KEENAN, SYLVIA B. LITTLE, MARY L. McDANIEL,
14 STEPHEN L. NUNN, WILLIAM G. REEVES, HEATHER A. SOREBO,
15 and
16 SUSAN M. WEYENBERG
17 ____________
18
19 Appeal No. 2006-1493
20 Application No. 10/037,276
21 Technology Center 3700
22 ____________
23
24 Decided: February 28, 2007
25 ____________
26
27
28 Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, and
29 JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
30
31 BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
32
33
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013