Appeal 2006-1508 Application 10/254,979 Kobayashi et al. (Kobayashi)1 62-026145 Feb. 4, 1987 (Japanese Kokai) THE REJECTION Claims 1, 4-9, 13 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Ichimaru in view of Kobayashi. OPINION We reverse the aforementioned rejection. We need to address only the sole independent claim, i.e., claim 1. Claim 1 requires a first long hole part (62) that engages a first shaft (48), and a second long hole part (64) that engages a second shaft (50) and is at an incline relative to the first long hole part (fig. 4). That claim also requires that the first shaft is movable along a first guide groove part (43B) and the first long hole part while the second shaft slides along the second long hole part so that the opening and closing member opens from a closed state to a predetermined angle (θ, fig. 5). Ichimaru discloses a mechanism for opening and closing a lid of a container for an automobile such as a cup holder (¶ 0001). The examiner relies upon the axial hole at shaft 31 1 Our consideration of Kobayashi is based upon the English translation thereof which is of record. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013