Ex Parte Mouro - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                     
                               for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                          
                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                              
                                                        ____________                                                               
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                              
                                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                                                
                                                        ____________                                                               
                               Ex parte MARCOS ANTONIO RODRIGUES MOURO                                                             
                                                        ____________                                                               
                                                      Appeal 2006-1555                                                             
                                                  Application 10/101,228                                                           
                                                  Technology Center 3600                                                           
                                                        ____________                                                               
                                                   Decided: July 27, 2007                                                          
                                                        ____________                                                               
                   Before WILLIAM F. PATE III, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and                                                            
                   HUBERT C. LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                  
                   WILLIAM F. PATE III, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               
                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                               

                                                  STATEMENT OF CASE                                                                

                          This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-9.  These are the                                 
                   only claims in the application.                                                                                 
                       We have jurisdiction over the appeal under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.                                          
                          The claimed invention is directed to an adjustable steering tie-rod for                                  
                   an automobile.  The tubular intermediate tie rod adjusting member, threaded                                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013