Ex Parte May - Page 8

                Appeal 2006-1776                                                                                                        
                Application 10/075,976                                                                                                  

                (section-by-section analysis of S. 1948 printed in the Congressional Record at the                                      
                request of Senator Lott) (“Section 4505 amends section 102(e) of the Patent Act to                                      
                treat an application published by the USPTO in the same fashion as a patent                                             
                published by the USPTO.  Accordingly, a published application is given prior art                                        
                effect as of its earliest effective U.S. filing date against any subsequently filed U.S.                                
                applications.”)                                                                                                         
                    Section 102(e)(1) gives prior art effect to U.S. patent application publications,                                   
                such as the published second Lively application, as of the earliest U.S. effective                                      
                filing date.  Congress in making a published application prior art as of its filing                                     
                date adopted for published applications the same prior art status that it previously                                    
                adopted for patents which are prior art.  A patent which is prior art under § 102(e)                                    
                may be prior art as of the date of its parent if the subject matter claimed in the                                      
                patent is described in the parent.  In re Wertheim, 646 F.2d 527, 209 USPQ 554                                          
                (CCPA 1981).  In making published applications prior art as of their filing date,                                       
                and recognizing that patents could be prior art as of some parent date, Congress                                        
                made no distinction between published applications and issued patents with respect                                      
                to earlier filed applications of either published applications or patents.  Had                                         
                Congress wished to limit a published application to its own filing date, and not                                        
                some earlier filing date based on a parent application, it would have explicitly said                                   
                so.  There is no cogent basis for treating issued patents and published applications                                    
                differently when it comes to the effective filing date of either.  Section 120 affords                                  
                an earlier prior art date to the published application as of the earliest date of those                                 
                applications upon which the application publication claims priority in which                                            
                support under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph is found.  Prior art under 35 U.S.C.                                     
                § 102(e) can be applied in rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  See Hazeltine                                             


                                                                   8                                                                    


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013