Appeal No. 2006-1887
Application No. 10/725,837
thus sustain the rejection of claims 1 and 5, and dependent claims 2-4 and 6-10
which appellant has not argued separately apart from claims 1 and 51, as being
unpatentable over Deasy in view of Myers.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-10 is
REVERSED.
1 Claims not argued separately apart from a representative claim stand or fall with the representative claim (see In re
Young, 927 F.2d 588, 590, 18 USPQ2d 1089, 1091 (Fed. Cir. 1991); In re Wood, 582 F.2d 638, 642, 199 USPQ 137,
140 (CCPA 1978)).
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013