Appeal Number: 2006-1938 Application Number: 10/823,886 golf ball spin from the lower number iron clubs to the higher numbered clubs is taught by Kobayashi, and the disclosure of Kawamatsu is suggestive of how to make this modification if it is desired, it is our legal conclusion that the subject matter of claim 1 would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill. Appellant argues that the teachings of the references are directed to the exact opposite of one another. Brief at 7; Reply at 3. However, such a view is to read the disclosure of Kawamatsu with blinders on. If Kawamatsu teaches a groove geometry that increases backspin when applied in one direction, i.e., with decreasing cross- sectional angles, then it provides a reasonable expectation of success that increasing the angles in the direction from low number clubs to higher number clubs would provide decreasing backspin. For obviousness under § 103, all that is required is a reasonable expectation of success. In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 897, 225 USPQ 645, 651-52 (Fed. Cir. 1985; In re Clinton, 527 F.2d 1226, 1228, 188 USPQ 365, 367 (CCPA 1976). The information in the Kawamatsu reference, when combined with the Kobayashi reference provides such a reasonable expectation of success. Appellant argues that the examiner has merely picked and chosen from portions of the prior art and thus has not 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013