Ex Parte Matonog et al - Page 2



            Appeal No. 2006-1955                                                                              
            Application No. 10/818,060                                                                        

                                              BACKGROUND                                                      
                   The appellants’ invention relates to a self-contained refrigeration unit                   
            designed to be installed in suitable receiving recesses in a truck or trailer                     
            refrigeration body (present specification, p. 1).   Claim 1, the only independent                 
            claim pending in the application, reads as follows:                                               
                         1. A refrigeration system comprising:                                                
                                at least one refrigeration unit comprising,                                   
                                an evaporator;                                                                
                                a condenser communicating a refrigerant to said                               
                         evaporator;                                                                          
                                a compressor communicating said refrigerant to                                
                         said condenser;                                                                      
                                a casing of a predetermined size supporting at least                          
                         said evaporator and said condenser;                                                  
                                a frame on a vehicle refrigeration compartment,                               
                         having an opening of about said predetermined size to                                
                         receive said casing wherein said refrigerant is                                      
                         substantially communicated within said casing; and                                   
                                said casing being removable as a unit with said                               
                         condenser and said evaporator.                                                       

                   The examiner relies upon the following as evidence of unpatentability:                     
            Crongeyer    US 4,196,657  Apr. 8, 1980                                                           
            Aldrich    US 4,641,502  Feb. 10, 1987                                                            
            Borges    US 5,878,592  Mar. 9, 1999                                                              

                   The appellants seek review of the examiner’s rejections of claims 1-4 and 6-               
            8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Aldrich in view of                          

                                                      2                                                       



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013