Appeal Number: 2006-1996
Application Number: 10/459,679
CONCLUSIONS
The rejections of claims 1, 7 and 8 under § 102 and claims 9 and 16 under §
103 as anticipated or rendered obvious by Randolph are reversed. The rejection of
claims 1-3 and 6-8 as anticipated by D’Souza is affirmed. The rejection of claims 4
and 5 as unpatentable over D’Souza in view of Lin is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
JRG
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013