The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ERIC ROMANSKI, CRAYTON GREGORY TONEY, JOSEPH G. O’CONNOR, and MAURICE R. PAQUIN ____________ Appeal 2006-2035 Application 09/923,936 Technology Center 3600 ____________ Decided: March 16, 2007 ____________ Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL The Appellants appeal from a rejection of claims 1-3. Claim 4 stands objected to as dependent from a rejected claim but allowable if rewritten in independent form. Claims 5-13 stand withdrawn from consideration by the Examiner as claiming a nonelected invention.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013