Appeal 2006-2056
Application 10/102,192
would have been obvious to use such an electronic table control in the game
of Webb.
REJECTION UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b)
As noted above, claims 14, 15, and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as unpatentable over Webb. The subject matter claimed differs from that
disclosed in Webb merely as to printed matter on the play table.
ORDER
The rejections of claims 1, 3, and 6 under § 112 are reversed.
The rejection of claims 12 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as
anticipated by Webb is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 14 and 16 as anticipated by Webb is reversed.
The rejection of claim 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over
Webb in view of Baerlocher is reversed.
The rejection of claim 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over
Webb in view of Adams is affirmed.
The rejection of claim 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over
Webb in view of Adams is also affirmed.
The rejections of claims 18 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are
reversed.
A new rejection of claims 14-16 has been entered pursuant to our
authority under 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b).
Regarding the affirmed rejection(s), 37 C.F.R. § 41.52(a)(1) provides
"Appellant may file a single request for rehearing within two months from
the date of the original decision of the Board."
In addition to affirming the Examiner's rejection(s) of one or more
claims, this decision contains new grounds of rejection pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013