Ex Parte Spiegel - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                     
                for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                       
                                                                                                                

                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                                     __________                                                  
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                                     __________                                                  
                                             Ex parte H. JAY SPIEGEL                                             
                                                     __________                                                  
                                                  Appeal 2006-2155                                               
                                               Application 10/747,179                                            
                Technology Center 3700                                                                           
                                                    ___________                                                  
                                               Decided: May 29, 2007                                             
                                                    ___________                                                  

                Before TERRY J. OWENS, STUART S. LEVY, and ANTON W.                                              
                FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                           
                OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              

                               DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                                 
                       The Appellant requests reconsideration of the affirmance of the                           
                rejection of claims 1-3, 8, 10, 11 and 14-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) over                       
                US 5,613,678 to McKee et al. in our March 26, 2007 decision (Request 1).                         
                       The Appellant argues that McKee’s disclosure that the tee functions as                    
                a conventional football tee (col. 11, ll. 5-6) indicates that there is no                        




Page:  1  2  3  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013