The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte H. JAY SPIEGEL __________ Appeal 2006-2155 Application 10/747,179 Technology Center 3700 ___________ Decided: May 29, 2007 ___________ Before TERRY J. OWENS, STUART S. LEVY, and ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING The Appellant requests reconsideration of the affirmance of the rejection of claims 1-3, 8, 10, 11 and 14-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) over US 5,613,678 to McKee et al. in our March 26, 2007 decision (Request 1). The Appellant argues that McKee’s disclosure that the tee functions as a conventional football tee (col. 11, ll. 5-6) indicates that there is noPage: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013