Appeal 2006-2175
Application 10/122,855
addition, the polymeric compounds manufactured using ethylene glycol and
propylene glycol (i.e., block polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene polymeric
compounds) would not be one of Appellants’ claimed polyhydroxy
compounds.
For the abovementioned reasons, we reverse the § 103(a) rejection of
claims 1-4 and 6-13 over Offshack.
CONCLUSION
We have affirmed the § 103(a) rejection of claims 1-4 and 6-13 over
Severson, Jr.
We have affirmed the § 103(a) rejection of claims 1-4, 7-9, and 11-12
over Panandiker.
We have reversed the § 103(a) rejection of claims 6, 10, and 13 over
Panandiker
We have reversed the § 103(a) rejection of claims 1-4 and 6-13 over
Offshack.
The Examiner’s decision is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv)(2006).
AFFIRMED
cam
20
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013