Appeal No. 2006-2177 Page 3 Application No. 10/127,152 a grab bar displayed below said scrolling navigational ribbon providing a means for also scrolling said navigational ribbon. 25. A user interface as described in Claim 23 wherein said electronic device is a personal digital assistant. Claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 12, 13, 16, 17, 23, 24, 27 and 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over David Siegel ("Siegel), Creating Killer Web Sites, and U.S. Patent No. 6,678,891 ("Wilcox"). Claims 3, 4, 14, 15, 25 and 26 stand rejected under § 103(a) as obvious over Siegel, Wilcox, and U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2003/ 0046401 A1 ("Abbott"). Claims 7- 11, 18- 22, and 29-33 stand rejected under § 103(a) as obvious over Siegel, Wilcox, and Yahoo! ("Yahoo"), http://web.archive.org /web/ 19981212034238/www.yahoo.com. II. OPINION Our opinion addresses the claims in the following order: • claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 12, 13, 16, 17, 23, 24, 27, and 28 • claims 7- 11, 18- 22, and 29-33 • claims 3, 4, 14, 15, 25 and 26. A. CLAIMS 1, 2, 5, 6, 12, 13, 16, 17, 23, 24, 27, AND 28 "When multiple claims subject to the same ground of rejection are argued as a group by appellant, the Board may select a single claim from the group of claims that are argued together to decide the appeal with respect to the group of claims as to thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013