Ex Parte Farnworth et al - Page 3

                Appeal 2006-2181                                                                              
                Application 10/878,586                                                                        
                the original Specification.  It is well settled that counsel’s arguments in the               
                Brief are no substitute for objective evidence.                                               
                      In conclusion, based on the foregoing, Appellants’ request is granted                   
                to the extent that we have reconsidered our Decision, but is denied with                      
                respect to making any change therein.                                                         
                      No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                      
                this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv)(2006).                          
                                          REHEARING - DENIED                                                  










                hh                                                                                            




                John M. Rariden                                                                               
                FLETCHER YODER                                                                                
                P.O. Box 692289                                                                               
                Houston, TX  77269-2289                                                                       






                                                      3                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3

Last modified: September 9, 2013