The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT COSMO DI LUCCIO,
MICHAEL A. DALEY, DAVID C. POTTS,
GREGORY M. LEFKOWITZ, JACK N. LINDON,
DAVID M. JACKSON, MATTHEW D. YOUNG,
CHERYL A. MOCADLO,
AND CANDACE D. KRAUTKRAMER
____________
Appeal 2006-2263
Application 09/859,665
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: May 23, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and
PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal the final rejection of claims 1-4, 6, 8-12, 14-20,
23-26, 32-34, 36-41, and 44 under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We have jurisdiction
over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013