The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MELISSA SILVESTRO, JOSEPH P. KING, JR.,
JOSEPH P. DEYESSO, ALBERT F. BEINOR, JR.,
LAWRENCE J. FEROLI, and JOSEPH L. BRIGHAM, JR.
____________
Appeal 2006-2289
Application 10/812,266
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: August 31, 2007
____________
Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, HUBERT C. LORIN, and JOSEPH A.
FISCHETTI, Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, III, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, and 9. These are
the only claims that remain in the application. We have jurisdiction under 35
U.S.C. §§ 134 and 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013