Ex Parte Silvestro et al - Page 1

                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                               
                                     is not binding precedent of the Board.                                        

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                          Ex parte MELISSA SILVESTRO, JOSEPH P. KING, JR.,                                         
                              JOSEPH P. DEYESSO, ALBERT F. BEINOR, JR.,                                            
                          LAWRENCE J. FEROLI, and JOSEPH L. BRIGHAM, JR.                                           
                                               Appeal 2006-2289                                                    
                                            Application 10/812,266                                                 
                                            Technology Center 3600                                                 
                                           Decided:  August 31, 2007                                               
             Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, HUBERT C. LORIN, and JOSEPH A.                                           
             FISCHETTI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                              
             PATE, III, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                    This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, and 9.  These are                   
             the only claims that remain in the application.  We have jurisdiction under 35                        
             U.S.C.  134 and 6.                                                                                  

Page:  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013