Ex Parte Aguilar et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2006-2315                                                                               
                Application 10/437,163                                                                         
                      1.  An edible oil-in-water emulsion comprising from 30 to 75% wt oil,                    
                water, live micro-organisms, and a preservation system, the emulsion having                    
                an edible acid content in the aqueous continuous phase in the range of from                    
                0.1 to 3% by weight and a pH at 20oC of not less than 4.0.                                     
                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                        
                unpatentability:                                                                               
                Gelfand    US 1,697,312  Jan. 1, 1929                                                          
                Lowe, "Experimental Cookery", 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,                            
                269-271 (1937).                                                                                
                Jay, "Modern Food Microbiology," 2nd Edition, D. Van Nostrand Co. 253-                         
                265 (1978).                                                                                    
                McGee, "On Food and Cooking, Collier Books, MacMillaim Publishing Co.,                         
                14 (1984).                                                                                     

                      The Examiner has rejected claims 1-17 under 35 U.S.C § 103(a) as                         
                unpatentable over Gelfand as further evidenced by McGee, Lowe and Jay.                         


                                                      ISSUES                                                   
                      The Examiner contends that one of ordinary skill in the art at the time                  
                of the invention would have understood Gelfand as disclosing the invention                     
                as claimed in light of the teachings of the secondary references.  Appellants                  
                contend that Gelfand fails to disclose a product having live microorganisms.                   
                Appellants further contend that the Examiner has not clearly established that                  
                Gelfand uses an oil-in-water emulsion, the recited pH and edible acid                          
                content of claim 1. The issue before is whether the Examiner has shown, by                     



                                                      2                                                        

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013