Ex Parte Draganitsch et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2006-2358                                                                              
                Application 09/817,573                                                                        
                                              BACKGROUND                                                      
                      Appellants’  invention  relates to  a  method  of  producing  a  wafer                  
                product containing a food product using at least two wafer sheets.  Claim 1,                  
                as presented in the Brief, appears below:                                                     
                      1.  A method of producing a wafer product, which comprises:                             
                      outputting a first wafer sheet with a sugar content of at least 23% or                  
                an equivalent content of a sugar substitute from a baking oven;                               
                      applying a layer of a food product to the first wafer sheet;                            
                      providing a second wafer sheet with a sugar content of at least 23% or                  
                an equivalent content of a sugar substitute, and placing the second wafer                     
                sheet on the first wafer sheet; and                                                           
                      subsequently compressing the first and second wafer sheets and                          
                shaping the first and second wafer sheets containing the layer of the food                    
                product while the first and second wafer sheets are maintained in a warm                      
                state sufficient to have an elasticity enabling said first and second wafer                   
                sheets to be shaped.                                                                          
                                                                                                             
                      The Examiner relies on the following references in rejecting the                        
                appealed subject matter:                                                                      
                      Wolf                     US 2,888,887              Jun.   2, 1959                      
                      Haas, Sr.2                US 4,518,617              May 21, 1985                        
                      Biggs                    US 5,709,898              Jan. 20, 1998                       

                      The Examiner has entered the following grounds of rejection:                            
                      Claims 1-3 and 5-6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                           
                obvious over Wolf and Biggs.                                                                  
                      Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the combined                      
                teachings of Wolf, Biggs, and Haas.                                                           
                                                                                                             
                2   Hereinafter referred to as “Haas.”                                                        

                                                      2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013