Appeal No. 2006-2369 Page 10 Application No. 10/169,618 combined with the polysaccharide moiety to produce polysaccharide urethane derivatives useful in video photographic paper. As acknowledged by the examiner (Answer, page 4), Sony ‘649 discloses the use of a cyclic alkyl-containing isocyanate, cyclohexyl isocyanate, see [0009], but does not teach the linear or branched alkyl- containing isocyanate recited in claim 9. However, Sony ‘775 lists a linear alkyl isocyanate, octyl isocyanate, alongside cyclohexyl isocyanate as an isocyanate compound useful in the preparation of polysaccharide urethane derivatives having utility in video photographic paper coatings. Sony ‘775, at [0012]. One of ordinary skill would therefore have recognized from Sony ‘775 that octyl isocyanate would have functioned equivalently to cyclohexyl isocyanate as the isocyanate moiety in polysaccharide urethane derivatives having utility in coatings for video photographic paper. Based on this recognized equivalence, one of ordinary skill would have further recognized the suitability of Sony ‘775’s octyl isocyanate in the hydrolysate-based urethane derivates disclosed by Sony ‘649, and would therefore have been motivated to have used the octyl isocyanate of Sony ‘775 as the isocyanate moiety in Sony ‘649’s hydrolysate-based urethane derivatives. As noted above, “[s]tructural relationships often provide the requisite motivation to modify known compounds to obtain new compounds.” In re Mayne, 104 F.3d at 1343, 41 USPQ2d at 1454 (holding fusion proteins obvious based on the substitution of equivalent amino acids). See also In re Fout, 675 F.2d 297, 301, 213 USPQ 532, 536 (CCPA 1982) (“Express suggestion to substitute one equivalent for another need not be present to render such substitution obvious.”). Because claim 9 recites the use of an isocyanate moiety recognized byPage: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013