Ex Parte Nawata et al - Page 1

                                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                       
                                       for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.                              

                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                             
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                             
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                                
                 Ex parte YASUHIRO NAWAZA, MASAKAZU YAMAMORI,  KOJI UEDA,                                                         
                                  HIDEKI YOKOYAMA, and MASATO FUJIKAE                                                             
                                                   Appeal No. 2006-2391                                                           
                                                Application No. 10/311,513                                                        
                                                  Technology Center 1700                                                          
                                                 Decided: January 30, 2007                                                        
               Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and JEFFREY T.                                                          
               SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                               
               SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                

                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                               
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. 134 from the Examiner’s final                                 
               rejection of claims 1 and 3-5, which are all of the claims pending in this                                         

               We AFFIRM.                                                                                                         


Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013