The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte PANAYOTIS C. ANDRICACOS, W. JEAN HORKANS, KEITH T. KWIETNIAK, PETER S. LOCKE, and CYPRIAN E. UZOH ____________ Appeal 2006-2410 Application 09/983, 235 Technology Center, 1700 ____________ Decided: January 24, 2007 ____________ Before PETER F. KRATZ, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER A review of the present record before us leads us to conclude that this case is not in condition for a decision on appeal. Accordingly, we remand the application to the Examiner, via the Office of the Director of the Technology Center, to consider the following issues and to take action not inconsistent with the views expressed herein.Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013